Separate assessment from selling
Ask what was observed, what was measured and what is inferred. A repair proposal and an independent engineering assessment serve different purposes. Ask who prepared the diagnosis, what qualifications are relevant in your state, and whether further investigation is recommended before selecting a repair method. We do not verify licenses or endorse contractors.
Ask for the baseline
Request a clear account of existing distress, measurements, inspection scope and limitations. Was plumbing assessed? Is there a history of repairs, drainage changes or imported fill? Are conclusions based on the actual structure, or mainly on a regional soil map? A map result should not replace a site investigation.
Compare the scope, not only the total
Put competing proposals side by side. Compare the problem each one is intended to address, investigation included, proposed work, exclusions, restoration, permits, follow-up measurements and warranty conditions. Do not use a generic online cost range as proof that a specific proposal is fair. Scope and site conditions can differ substantially.
Keep uncertainty in the decision
Ask what evidence would change the recommendation and which parts of the problem remain unexplained. A high soil class does not prove that repair is necessary; a low class does not prove the structure is sound. Significant or changing symptoms should be assessed by a suitably qualified local professional, not resolved by adjusting an online score.
Sources and interpretation
Explanations and workflow are our own. This is educational screening, not a site investigation or engineering recommendation.